We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[.data.table
In this code:
library(data.table) parameters <- list(types = c(p1 = "r", p2 = "r", p3 = "r", dummy = "c"), digits = 4) n <- 10000 newConfigurations <- data.table(p1 = runif(n), p2 = runif(n), p3 = runif(n), dummy = sample(c("d1", "d2"), n, replace=TRUE)) repair_sum2one <- function(configuration, parameters) { isreal <- names(which(parameters$types[colnames(configuration)] == "r")) digits <- parameters$digits[isreal] c_real <- unlist(configuration[isreal]) c_real <- c_real / sum(c_real) c_real[-1] <- round(c_real[-1], digits[-1]) c_real[1] <- 1 - sum(c_real[-1]) configuration[isreal] <- c_real return(configuration) } j <- colnames(newConfigurations) for (i in seq_len(nrow(newConfigurations))) set(newConfigurations, i, j = j, value = repair_sum2one(as.data.frame(newConfigurations[i]), parameters))
More than half the time is spent in [.data.table. Even the function repair_sum2one is faster.
repair_sum2one
Originally posted by @MLopez-Ibanez in #3735 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
AFAIR there is already PR that solves that, possibly authored by my person
Sorry, something went wrong.
which PR solves this? (would be useful in our efforts at performance testing)
#4488 Possibly
No branches or pull requests
In this code:
More than half the time is spent in
[.data.table
. Even the functionrepair_sum2one
is faster.Originally posted by @MLopez-Ibanez in #3735 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: