Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add getextra with default #182

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bvdmitri
Copy link
Member

A simple PR that adds a new method for getextra with default

@bvdmitri bvdmitri requested a review from wouterwln March 19, 2024 09:54
@bvdmitri bvdmitri marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 09:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.49%. Comparing base (54eb171) to head (db172d4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev-4.0.0.

❗ Current head db172d4 differs from pull request most recent head b225c30. Consider uploading reports for the commit b225c30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           dev-4.0.0     #182      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      91.85%   91.49%   -0.37%     
=============================================
  Files             15       15              
  Lines           1842     1775      -67     
=============================================
- Hits            1692     1624      -68     
- Misses           150      151       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wouterwln wouterwln merged commit 37c54e3 into dev-4.0.0 Mar 19, 2024
1 check passed
@wouterwln wouterwln deleted the dev-4.0.0-get-extra-or-default branch March 19, 2024 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants