Replies: 1 comment
-
I personally don't see the need to be too prescriptive, especially on package name. Package discoverability relies on a lot more than just its name. So long as the package meets the API spec, and works, I'm happy. If you do find issues, or APIs which don't feel quite right, please report back! Using SQS is presumably just acting as the queue store, therefore there's going to be a lot of duplication of the code from say the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'd like to hear everyone's opinions on how to implement a third-party backend for Django tasks. Let's take an SQS backend for example. I would name it
django_tasks_sqs
, and other backends could follow that pattern. Are there any guidelines for backends and workers that should be followed?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions