Allow to have a more strict validation about officially registered format

[LasneF]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

give the specification attached , the validation says Woohoo! Your API description is valid.
that rigourously speacking it is ,

but having for a field with a format date , a value 1Y looks not correct

Describe the solution you'd like

given fields with format , if format is well known such as date , uuid, redocly should raise a warning , this as an opinionnated good practices around well known format

(notice that it is an opinionnated rules as from a strict json schema point of view format is just an annotation not a strict validation item)

Describe alternatives you've considered

moving to pattern could be an option but that is not really sustainaible especially for date, as it is spreading a complex regular expression

Additional context

here a tiny sample that show case that date are not considered

smallDate.json

[LasneF]

looking carrefully there https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/string#format

i am not clear if it is an enhancement , or a bug as date is an official registered format

[tatomyr]

I'm closing this as it's a duplicate of #766.