Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upper bound on structuredRegular volume dimensions? #20

Open
nastronaut opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Upper bound on structuredRegular volume dimensions? #20

nastronaut opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@nastronaut
Copy link

Hello,

I am attempting to render an isosurface in a 5120^3 structuredRegular volume on OSPRay. The volume has a scalar field where the data are provided by floats (doing the math, that's half a terabyte of data). I use mmap since I do not have half a terabyte of CPU memory. When I render I see artifacts where it appears blocks are missing or are rendered differently at the high end of the X and Y dimensions (the more rapidly changing dimensions in my data object). Is there an upper bound on how large the dimensions can be in a structuredRegular volume? I could not find such a bound in the OpenVKL or OSPRay docs.

The attached image is from an early time step in the simulation. The isosurface should have a relatively uniform texture across the domain in X and Y. If I down sample the data to 1024^3 and render that I do get a relatively uniform isosurface.

Thanks,

Patrick
5120-isosurface-example

@gregjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Patrick,
Thanks for reporting the issue. There should be no upper bound on volume dimensions, so this does appear to be a bug. Can you tell me which specific Open VKL and OSPRay versions you're using? We can then try to reproduce this ourselves and look for a fix.
Thanks!,
Greg

@nastronaut
Copy link
Author

I'm using relatively recent versions of the libraries:

Embree version: 3.13.5

OpenVKL version: 1.3.1

OSPRay version: 2.10.0

Thanks,

Patrick

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants