You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What's the point of listing all these shells? Am I supposed to be able to access each of them? Which are relevant to this material? I presume that bash (and perhaps csh/tcsh) is what we're really supposed to be concentrating on, so this material should be presented in a way that makes that clear. Also, what is POSIX and why do I care???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
as for the "point", it is in the section title ... and their relevance to existing neuroimaging projects. I find frequently people talking about all the shells without realizing that they are very much different. And many well established neuroimaging projects use different shells.
POSIX -- indeed we should add a reference and reason for knowing about it existence since it is a set of standards, and without adhering to commonly accepted standards we would get nowhere, neuroimaging including. Adding to the issue title
yarikoptic
changed the title
Commonly used shells section
Commonly used shells section; elaborate on POSIX
Feb 1, 2018
What's the point of listing all these shells? Am I supposed to be able to access each of them? Which are relevant to this material? I presume that bash (and perhaps csh/tcsh) is what we're really supposed to be concentrating on, so this material should be presented in a way that makes that clear. Also, what is POSIX and why do I care???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: