We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As discussed at the WRROC meeting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
E.g. like https://schema.org/sha256, but we also need other popular ones
Sorry, something went wrong.
see also https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6920
From schemaorg/schemaorg#3162
rfc6920 Naming things with hashes that establishes ways to identify checksum algorithms and representing their checksums as URIs.
Example:
ni:///sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk
identifies anything with the sha256 with the given base64-encoded checksum
alternatively in hex/human readable:
nih:sha-256;7f83b1657ff1fc53b92dc18148a1d65dfc2d4b1fa3d677284addd200126d9069
(rfc6920 also specifies how to deal with truncation)
See rfc6920 register for more algorithms.
Combined with arcp URIs this is suggested already by RO-Crate for Establishing a base URI inside a ZIP file.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
As discussed at the WRROC meeting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: