We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On the SuperSwap could I recommend using a batchCall to avoid the approve+swap double transaction?
Only problem is it would require a tiny change to the contract to enable the batch call (it needs to be a superApp)
Alternatively, an ERC777 Callback could be implemented to remove the double tx as well
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://discord.com/channels/862796510604296263/986040775160766474/988232674432921634
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
On the SuperSwap could I recommend using a batchCall to avoid the approve+swap double transaction?
Only problem is it would require a tiny change to the contract to enable the batch call (it needs to be a superApp)
Alternatively, an ERC777 Callback could be implemented to remove the double tx as well
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: