Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebRave Raster symbolization method for categorical #130

Closed
MattReimer opened this issue Jun 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

WebRave Raster symbolization method for categorical #130

MattReimer opened this issue Jun 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request 🌐 Viewer Web Our web map viewer inside the data exchange symbology Use for new symbology work
Milestone

Comments

@MattReimer
Copy link
Member

MattReimer commented Jun 28, 2021

On friday we did a demo and it was discovered that categorical rasters don't have an export button in QGIS. When you dig through and finally export it you get a CLR file instead of the webramp we've designed the process around.

This needs to be solved and we need a method for symbolizing all kinds of rasters in WebRAVe

Also related to:

@MattReimer MattReimer added enhancement New feature or request symbology Use for new symbology work 🌐 Viewer Web Our web map viewer inside the data exchange labels Jun 28, 2021
@MattReimer MattReimer self-assigned this Jun 28, 2021
@MattReimer MattReimer added this to the WebRAVE 1.0 milestone Sep 20, 2021
@MattReimer
Copy link
Member Author

We now have fixes for both the discrete and the exact raster types.

INTERPOLATION:EXACT is what we need to use for categorical rasters and you can see this in play here:

https://github.com/Riverscapes/RiverscapesXML/blob/master/Symbology/web/Shared/Existing_Veg_EVT_Riparian.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request 🌐 Viewer Web Our web map viewer inside the data exchange symbology Use for new symbology work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant