-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Role based private group/room access #357
Comments
Came here to request this. |
This would add so much functionality. Channels need more thorough ACLs than they have now. IMO this and more seamless voice/video experience would make rocket.chat a real contender. |
please add this feature! thanks for such great project |
This would be an awesome feature! |
Is there anything new on this topic? We had the idea, if it is possible to program a bot, which automatically adds the members to the channels based on their roles. Has anyone tried this before? |
You can achieve a similar behavior with teams feature: https://docs.rocket.chat/use-rocket.chat/user-guides/rooms/teams |
Thanks for the quick answer. |
It's not the ideal workflow, but you can manually assign users to their teams and that would add them to their rooms. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, assigning users to a role gives them that role, but that role can't designate what private group/room they get put in because the role is only scoped globally, and does nothing.
Describe the solution you'd like
We need to be able to have users dropped into their respective private rooms/groups based on the global role that gets assigned via SSO/OAuth.
Currently, assigning users to a role gives them that role, but that role can't designate what private group/room they get put in because the role is only scoped globally, and does nothing.
If I change the scope of that role (that the user is already part of) to rooms vs global, the user does not get put into the rooms assigned to that role.
Ideally, adding them to a role that is tied to rooms/private groups puts that user into those rooms/private groups.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Manually adding users to rooms via the API, which is not ideal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: