Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add orcid references for the team #2

Open
sosey opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Add orcid references for the team #2

sosey opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sosey
Copy link
Collaborator

sosey commented Nov 27, 2024

Do we have everyone's ORCID reference for the PIT team? However is appropriate, we can add them to the template CITATION file so that new packages automatically start with them:

https://github.com/Roman-Supernova-PIT/package-template/blob/main/%7B%7B%20cookiecutter.package_name%20%7D%7D/CITATION.cff

@sosey sosey added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 27, 2024
@benjaminrose
Copy link

Do we want the default to have everyone on the author list?

@sosey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sosey commented Dec 2, 2024

yah, I'm fine with that. Just need everyones orcid numbers etc, folks can PR that information in if they want or we can collect it in slack

@sosey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sosey commented Jan 9, 2025

This is the file that folks should update to include their orcid information: https://github.com/Roman-Supernova-PIT/package-template/blob/main/%7B%7B%20cookiecutter.package_name%20%7D%7D/CITATION.cff

@benjaminrose
Copy link

Do we want the default to be the whole team? The current publication policy (for papers) is opt in not opt out. I am not sure if we specify this in the coding policy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants