Using Capture::Tiny #1042
Closed
bschmalhofer
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
Not much benefit, but no objections either because it is only a small module. Presumable no additional dependencies. Let's do it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Handling this in issue #2305. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The issue https://github.com/RotherOSS/CodePolicy/issues/58 proposes that the CodePoliy should not complain about reopening STDOUT and STDERR. But maybe there is a better way.
This is current code:
This code is fine, but kind of cryptic. An alternative is to use
Capture::Tiny
.But permanently changing STDOUT is not nice. Is using Capture::Tiny really a good idea?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions