Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] Node.js API: TypeScript type definition support #475

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

matz3
Copy link
Member

@matz3 matz3 commented Jun 24, 2020

Lazy-loading breaks the automatic type definition detection from

TypeScript. Therefore we need to manually declare the exported types.

Lazy-loading breaks the automatic type definition detection from

TypeScript. Therefore we need to manually declare the exported types.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 24, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 91.339% when pulling cc47caf on fix-ts-support into 4e75d4d on master.

@matz3 matz3 requested a review from RandomByte July 14, 2020 07:39
Copy link
Member

@RandomByte RandomByte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit message might confuse some into thinking this is a feature of the buil. E.g. generating typescript type definitions for UI5 projects.

Could we change the commit message to something which makes it clear that this is about the index.js or "ui5-builder API" itself and not a feature of the actual build?

Also, the purpose of the plugin should be roughly explained in the commit message.

@matz3 matz3 changed the title [FIX] TypeScript type definition support [FIX] Node.js API: TypeScript type definition support Jul 14, 2020
@matz3 matz3 merged commit 7858810 into master Jul 14, 2020
@matz3 matz3 deleted the fix-ts-support branch July 14, 2020 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants