-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't use domain-specific prop descriptions/names #1
Comments
Open
This is especially silly: dct:type a owl:ObjectProperty;
vann:usageNote "The recommended controlled vocabulary is the <a href=\"./codelist/estimationprocedure-type.html\">Estimation Procedure type</a> code list."@en,
"The recommended controlled vocabulary is the <a href=\"./codelist/feature-type.html\">Feature type</a> code list."@en,
"The recommended controlled vocabulary is the <a href=\"./codelist/flowparameter-type.html\">Flow Parameter type</a> code list."@en,
"The recommended controlled vocabulary is the <a href=\"./codelist/predictionfeature-type.html\">Prediction Feature type</a> code list."@en;
rdfs:comment "A classification for a quality."@en, "A classification of the attribute."@en;
rdfs:label "type"@en . So... which is the recommended controlled vocabulary really? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://semiceu.github.io/MLDCAT-AP/releases/1.0.0/rdf/mldcat-ap.ttl.
Don't use domain-specific prop descriptions/names, else you end up with silly stuff like this:
A title is a title, no matter to what resource you apply it to.
I appreciate that you collect prop names/descriptions from all places where a prop is used.
But then, these characteristics should be universal, not specific to the place where used.
If you need to make a distinction, you can use scopeNote, eg:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: