-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HayterMSAsq erratic results at very small Q and needs test on Mac (Trac #377) #511
Comments
Trac update at |
Trac update at |
Trac update at
This is probably part of the core sasmodels work .. or at least very close. Think we should make this blocker for now -- though if it "works" but refinement is still desired we can downgrade this a bit?
|
Trac update at
|
Trac update at I now have a better version, having fixed a bug in my Taylor expansion at small Q, this has not been uploaded to |GIT as I want to change its name also, will need help to sort ths at code camp. |
Trac update at This is as finished as it will be. Main conclusion is it will have to ALWAYS use double precision. May add a FISH version later which may be more stable. Closing this ticket. |
Trac update at
|
HayterMSAsq gives poor reproducibility on different cpu at very small Q.
It likely needs an asymptotic limit in the code. (RichardH will later try to add HayterRMSA as used in FISH, which is in any case better.)
It also needs to be tested on a Mac cpu.
Paul K said: can run a number of different configurations:
It fails completely on intel-gpu-single-ocl and it gives invalid results for low q on the other single precision platforms (gpu and cpu). The double precision platforms work fine.
Migrated from http://trac.sasview.org/ticket/377
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: