Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

control order in which fit parameters appear in gui for user supplied models (Trac #544) #1310

Closed
ajj opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@ajj
Copy link
Member

ajj commented Mar 30, 2019

User supplied models written in sasmodels style can now be loaded automatically in UI (ticket #764) - make sure the parameter order is behaving.

Migrated from http://trac.sasview.org/ticket/544

{
    "status": "closed",
    "changetime": "2016-03-21T22:02:27",
    "_ts": "2016-03-21 22:02:27.241626+00:00",
    "description": "User supplied models written in sasmodels style can now be loaded automatically in UI (ticket #632) - make sure the parameter order is behaving.",
    "reporter": "ajj",
    "cc": "",
    "resolution": "fixed",
    "workpackage": "SasModels Redesign",
    "time": "2016-03-20T11:49:15",
    "component": "SasView",
    "summary": "control order in which fit parameters appear in gui for user supplied models",
    "priority": "major",
    "keywords": "",
    "milestone": "SasView 4.0.0",
    "owner": "",
    "type": "defect"
}
@gonzalezma
Copy link
Contributor

Trac update at 2016/03/21 22:02:27:

  • gonzalezm commented:

Works as for standard models now. The problem of ordering remains for models generated with Sum|Multi.

  • gonzalezm changed resolution from "" to "fixed"
  • gonzalezm changed status from "new" to "closed"

@ajj ajj closed this as completed Mar 30, 2019
@ricleal ricleal transferred this issue from SasView/sasview Apr 23, 2019
@ricleal ricleal transferred this issue from SasView/sasmodels Apr 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants