Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remote python interpreter #42

Closed
victron opened this issue Sep 7, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

remote python interpreter #42

victron opened this issue Sep 7, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@victron
Copy link

victron commented Sep 7, 2018

Hello,

Sorry for may be strange question:
Does it possible with this extension to use remote python interpreter.
If some one has experience please share for win10.

Thank you.

@gigi206
Copy link

gigi206 commented Sep 15, 2018

Not exactly the same issue #45.

@victron speak about python remote interpreter.

For me is the local Python interpreter that doesn't work with the remote file.

@SchoofsKelvin
Copy link
Owner

This isn't something I can fix. The python language extension(s) need to add support for non-local-disk files.

Local related issues: #16, #27
Remote related issues: microsoft/vscode#51700, microsoft/vscode#54189

@SchoofsKelvin
Copy link
Owner

@gigi206 While it's indeed not entirely the same issue, it more or less has the same root cause and "solution", the solution being that the extensions need to add support for remote files.

@gigi206
Copy link

gigi206 commented Sep 15, 2018

@SchoofsKelvin this extension works with python on remote FS but I prefer your extension.

Perhaps is not totally the same mechanism with yours and this extension ?

@SchoofsKelvin
Copy link
Owner

It is indeed a different mechanism. I use the new FileSystemProvider API, while that extension adds a new tree view, as in, it doesn't use the default File Explorer but creates a fake one.

I've been following some issues, e.g. microsoft/vscode#47475 to see if there's something on my end to have better support with other extensions, but right now, it seems like it's up to other extensions to use the new API, instead of just directly reading from disk.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants