You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
A nice feature would be able to compose these lazy operators. This will be difficult though. It would be killer to be able to support intermediates of scalars, functions, and AbstractArrays so that way something like
u_t =a(t,x)u_xx +b(t,x)u_x
will compose to a single operator on the LHS, or
u_t = (D*u_x)_x
where D is some vector of diffusion constants.
The composition should include the ability to combine with I, so that way I - gamma*L works.
Of course, we'd have to start with a simpler version, but this kind of composition would be absolutely awesome for using stiff integrators.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They probably shouldn't output the function, but instead should evaluate all of the proper functions so that way it outputs the solution.
If you have a design go ahead an implement, though I'm not entirely sure what the correct design for this is right now anyways. Instead of hanging on this, you might want to work on something more clear like boundary conditions while thinking about how to design this. It likely needs to be its own wrapper type which can wraper scalars, AbstractMatrixs, Functions, and LinearOperators, and then somehow "recall" how they should be put together.
A nice feature would be able to compose these lazy operators. This will be difficult though. It would be killer to be able to support intermediates of scalars, functions, and
AbstractArray
s so that way something likewill compose to a single operator on the LHS, or
where
D
is some vector of diffusion constants.The composition should include the ability to combine with
I
, so that wayI - gamma*L
works.Of course, we'd have to start with a simpler version, but this kind of composition would be absolutely awesome for using stiff integrators.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: