Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename lockfile_dir to avoid builtin name #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2021

Conversation

lbdreyer
Copy link
Member

Noticed this small issue: in one of the noxfile functions, it names a variable dir. dir is a built in function so it shouldn't be used to as a variable name, as it overrides the builtin function.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #92 (4dafe67) into main (2456f9b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #92   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.82%   98.82%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         678      678           
=======================================
  Hits          670      670           
  Misses          8        8           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2456f9b...4dafe67. Read the comment docs.

@lbdreyer lbdreyer changed the title Rename loxfile_dir to avoid builtin name Rename lockfile_dir to avoid builtin name Jun 28, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@stephenworsley stephenworsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@zklaus zklaus merged commit b9e8a42 into SciTools:main Jul 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants