You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2022. It is now read-only.
However, this isn't really an accurate depiction of the courses since if you choose a lecture, there are only a certain number of sections that you have available to you. Would it be a possibility to include an array field of associated sections in the lectures field, where it contains a string array of the sections that are associated with a given lecture if that is the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also, although the raw file doesn't associate which lecture goes with what section, if you do an empty search on SOC, it'll separate the different sections by lectures, depending on which sections are able to go with what lecture.
This appears to be some sort of issue on CMU's part where the raw data gives us less information than through the SOC. Alternatively, as a fix, someone could implement something similar to how the FCE processing works, and just ask the user to download a copy of the webpage of a blank search so that the system can process it.
For classes that have large lectures, the JSON data makes lectures and sections completely independent of one another similar to the following,
However, this isn't really an accurate depiction of the courses since if you choose a lecture, there are only a certain number of sections that you have available to you. Would it be a possibility to include an array field of associated sections in the lectures field, where it contains a string array of the sections that are associated with a given lecture if that is the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: