-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edit first paragraph to remove ACS reference #6812
Comments
Thank you for reporting this issue. We will be triaging your incoming issue as soon as possible. |
Continue reading the blue box... it states that even though retired, it doesn't impact add-ins. |
I read that, and that confused me more. Hence this ticket. Does that clause in the parans mean:
#1 is clearly not the case because the entire article is about using it with SPS Addins. Which leaves #2, which asks that developers use the ACS (retired now!) service to perform AuthZ. Is it one day going to stop working for this scenario too? Is there some alternate service/API people should switch over to? When you read it as an existing SPS Add-in developer (i.e., one who has a few addins in play) with no plans to change or upgrade their code, you would read "okay, no impact to me" and move on. But if you're someone writing a new set of add-ins or working on upgrade plans/etc, then this creates more questions. The text is not clear to me. |
I think you're reading into this a bit more than necessary :). This doc simply explains show things work under the covers. Originally, add-ins use ACS... but since then Azure retired ACS, but not the underlying infrastructure that implemented it. As such, there's no impact to SharePoint add-ins... everything in the doc still applies... the extra callout about ACS being retired was simply added to address all the questions MSFT was receiving about "now that ACS is being retired, how will this impact add-ins". The blue box is saying "it doesn't". |
Issues that have been closed & had no follow-up activity for at least 7 days are automatically locked. Please refer to our wiki for more details, including how to remediate this action if you feel this was done prematurely or in error: Issue List: Our approach to locked issues |
The first paragraph ends as:
Then there is a huge blue box under that, talking about retirement of ACS in 2018 (more than 2 years ago).
Please edit the first paragraph and other references to the (now retired ?) ACS and provide updated information.
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: