We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changing this will clearly break Sorbet parsing without other additional, non-autocorrected changes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you have an example where the autocorrect is incorrect?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks!
I can circle back and make an example, but literally any file with method definitions but without signatures would be a good example.
That is to say this cannot be a safe autocorrect on untyped files, basically by definition
Okay if I understand correctly you're saying StrictSigil autocorrect is unsafe because it can create typechecking errors.
StrictSigil
That makes sense to me. Feel free to open a PR.
Sorbet/StrictSigil
Safe: false
No branches or pull requests
Changing this will clearly break Sorbet parsing without other additional, non-autocorrected changes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: