You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A major advantage of the Field diagnostic compared to Probes is that the x axis can be changed with the propagation of the moving window if the user selects moving=True, but it only shows half plane in "AMcylindrical" geometry.
On the other hand, Probes allow to visualise both half planes (e.g. the whole xy plane) if properly positioned, but do not allow the moving=True because this would not be manageable with all the possible Probes positioning.
One compromise to couple the advantages of both diagnostics would be to add an argument in the Field diagnostic, e.g. show_also_theta_plus_pi, to show also the plane at the selected theta+pi when set to True, and visualising both half-planes combined.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A major advantage of the
Field
diagnostic compared toProbes
is that thex
axis can be changed with the propagation of the moving window if the user selectsmoving=True
, but it only shows half plane in"AMcylindrical"
geometry.On the other hand,
Probes
allow to visualise both half planes (e.g. the wholexy
plane) if properly positioned, but do not allow themoving=True
because this would not be manageable with all the possibleProbes
positioning.One compromise to couple the advantages of both diagnostics would be to add an argument in the
Field
diagnostic, e.g.show_also_theta_plus_pi
, to show also the plane at the selectedtheta
+pi when set toTrue
, and visualising both half-planes combined.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: