We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For lower top surfaces perimeters are shifted inward, especially when there are number of walls:
I guess instead of complex calculations here
OrcaSlicer/src/libslic3r/PerimeterGenerator.cpp
Line 885 in 7ab2fab
something like coord_t offset_top_surface = ext_perimeter_width; could produce better result:
coord_t offset_top_surface = ext_perimeter_width;
providing base for next layer external perimeter. Picture is from Prusa with ported code.
Orca-Cube.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are you working on a PR?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Not really. Merill took this code to his SS and used some other formula - supermerill/SuperSlicer#4022 (comment)
Orca bot: this issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.
Orca bot: This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
For lower top surfaces perimeters are shifted inward, especially when there are number of walls:
I guess instead of complex calculations here
OrcaSlicer/src/libslic3r/PerimeterGenerator.cpp
Line 885 in 7ab2fab
something like
coord_t offset_top_surface = ext_perimeter_width;
could produce better result:providing base for next layer external perimeter. Picture is from Prusa with ported code.
Orca-Cube.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: