Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more than one sata drive is unstable #66

Open
aep opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

more than one sata drive is unstable #66

aep opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@aep
Copy link

aep commented Jul 17, 2021

when attaching 2 identical drives, sda times out.
both drives work fine when running alone.

same behaviour on CEX rev 1.7 and 2.0 with clearfog itx 1.2

[    9.366518] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
[    9.372964] ata2.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible
[   14.522519] ata2.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x2f)
[   14.526628] ata2.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported
[   14.532124] ata2.00: Security Log not supported
[   14.536655] ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x40)
[   14.542225] ata2: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps
[   14.547356] ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/133:PIO3
[   15.026546] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   15.032764] ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100)
[   15.039029] ata2.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[   15.043903] ata2.00: disabled
[   15.522521] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   16.002520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   16.482520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   16.962520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   17.442520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   17.922520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   18.402520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   18.882516] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   19.362521] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   19.842520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   20.322520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   20.802520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   21.282500] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   21.762521] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   22.242519] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   22.722520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   23.202520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   23.682520] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320)
[   74.986527] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x2000 SErr 0x180000 action 0x6 frozen
[   74.994281] ata3: SError: { 10B8B Dispar }
[   74.998384] ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
[   75.003540] ata3.00: cmd 60/08:68:20:6a:70/00:00:74:00:00/40 tag 13 ncq dma 4096 in
[   75.003540]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
[   75.018594] ata3.00: status: { DRDY }
[   75.498576] ata3.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[   81.046578] ata3.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[   86.678573] ata3.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
[   87.158584] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 1953524256 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
[   88.598597] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 1953524256 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
[   88.609208] Buffer I/O error on dev sda, logical block 244190532, async page read
[   92.894545] ata2: EH pending after 5 tries, giving up
@justizin
Copy link
Contributor

justizin commented Dec 6, 2022

Having similar problems about 18mo later, frustratingly... I'm trying to build a SATA raid with four identical SSDs, I can almost never see all four, and I get lots of similar dmesg entries to above.

This is one of the more severe, but certainly not the only, reasons I'm looking at building a custom kernel.

I honestly upgraded a quad of older drives which were Fast Enough(tm) for my needs because I worried they were too old of SATA or something, but same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants