Add a simpler way to define route patterns

[itaym2]

Currently the library only supports regex to define route patterns:
http.get().to('/some/path/[a-zA-Z]+$').willSucceed();

I think we should support a simpler way to define such routes:
http.get().to('/some/path/{anything}').willSucceed();

Thoughts?

[YoniH]

Good idea!
Just need to define what anything actually means. Your example regex matches only letters, anything probably implies also numbers and other characters.
Maybe anything should map to something like this: [-a-zA-Z0-9@:%_\+.~#?&\/=]*