Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add details for using GitHub #2

Open
plzmsu opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Add details for using GitHub #2

plzmsu opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@plzmsu
Copy link
Collaborator

plzmsu commented Jul 3, 2020

we should fill out the GitHub section more, probably to include the general stuff (not repository list) from following: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hf6whmT48RBGdYTarVF7IGTwyGrPf840NEys5qS6mIk/edit#

In particular, we need to include mention of how one interfaces with existing project-wide repositories. I think we want people to work on the organization GitHub rather than their own GitHub. This should be written as a guide for 1) how you start using GitHub (see link above), 2) how you work in a GitHub organization like NEON-biodiversity, etc.

@billspat
Copy link
Collaborator

billspat commented Jul 6, 2020

I agree! Should we also suggested standard workflow (as we dicussed over email)? Finally, should writing about using Git (or any other 'non-R' tech) go into our R-guide because it's closely related, or into a policy/worflow document we started for NEON-biodiv? Somehow I was thinking the R guide should focus on R, and the coding policy is for everything else. OR should we really just have one document that covers R, Git, data organization, EDI, etc? The "policy" doc for NEON-biodiv would be things very specific to NEON and also mostly "see our R guide for how to use git" I'm ok with any of those, just want to avoid redundancy and encourage as many collaborators as possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants