New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sets without Gets should Get Nothing #109

Closed

StartAutomating opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 0 comments

Assignees

Labels

Owner

StartAutomating commented Jul 10, 2023

A ScriptProperty requires both a get and a set.

However, some properties really are just for setting.

In these cases, we should create an almost empty get that explicitly returns nothing.

StartAutomating added the enhancement label

StartAutomating self-assigned this

StartAutomating mentioned this issue

Merged

StartAutomating closed this as completed in

dfe8b4e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment