Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For the Ruby Image, Why don't we use nano server as the base? #452

Open
yangxinyun opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

For the Ruby Image, Why don't we use nano server as the base? #452

yangxinyun opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@yangxinyun
Copy link

Hi,

Is Ruby still not working with nano server 2019?

It would be really interesting if we can have a nano server version of it.

@StefanScherer
Copy link
Owner

Hi @yangxinyun
I haven‘t tried it again since my first investigation.
But typically it doesn‘t get solved automatically.
The problem is to find out why it doesn‘t start when you try it. The NanoServerApiScan tool was helpful to get a basic understanding which API calls need to be changed. But then you have to work with the Ruby maintainers do find the code and fix it.

@yangxinyun
Copy link
Author

Hi @StefanScherer ,

Thanks for your information. I am actually struggling with Fluentd windows image, trying to make a working nano one for fluentd, but failed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants