You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The function from the title is called .totalMemMb, which suggests a return value in megabit.
I found the actual return value to be in MiB, (mebibytes)
(Mb = megabit, MB = megabyte, MiB = mebibyte, there's a difference!)
Therefore I think the function name should be changed to .totalMemMib.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, since Mb is megabit, the difference is quite a lot. On my server with 64GB ram, the return value of the function is 65365,1484375, which is the amount of MiB. If it were actually in Mb like the name suggests, the amount should be 574957,9260666838.
That's about 8.8 times more.
The function from the title is called .totalMemMb, which suggests a return value in megabit.
I found the actual return value to be in MiB, (mebibytes)
(Mb = megabit, MB = megabyte, MiB = mebibyte, there's a difference!)
Therefore I think the function name should be changed to .totalMemMib.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: