Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACAD10 #739

Closed
Devlin-Moyer opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

ACAD10 #739

Devlin-Moyer opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Devlin-Moyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Devlin-Moyer commented Dec 5, 2023

When working on #726, I noticed that ACAD10 (ENSG00000111271) is currently associated with only two reactions in Human-GEM:

ID reaction GPR
MAR03212 FAD [m] + propanoyl-CoA [m] --> acrylyl-CoA [m] + FADH2 [m] ACAD10 or ACADM or ACADS or ACAD8 or ACAD9 or ACADSB or ACAD11
MAR03163 butyryl-CoA [m] + FAD [m] --> crotonyl-CoA [m] + FADH2 [m] ACAD10 or ACADM or ACADS or ACAD8 or ACAD9 or ACADSB or ACAD11

Uniprot says ACAD10 can only act on (R)- and (S)-2-methyl-pentadecanoyl-CoA, citing this paper. From the end of the paragraph under the section heading "Prokaryotic expression of ACAD10 and ACAD11" of that paper:

Extracts from cells expressing a predicted mature mitochondrial ACAD10 insert were only active with R and S, 2 methyl-C15-CoA (R and S, 2-methyl-pentadecanoyl-CoA) among a broad series of other substrates including the optimum ones for all of the other ACADs. The measured activity (1.4 mU/mg at 150 μM substrate concentration) is considerably lower than that obtained with other expressed ACADs towards their optimum substrates, suggesting that the dehydrogenation reaction between ACAD10 and R or S, 2 methyl-C15-CoA is unlikely the optimal function for ACAD10 in vivo.

I can't seem to find any other papers that ever showed that ACAD10 can act on propanoyl-CoA, butyryl-CoA, or anything else. Also Human-GEM does not already seem to have a metabolite for 2-methyl-pentadecanoyl-CoA; the closest I can find is pristanoyl-CoA (MAM00078x), i.e. 2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecanoyl-CoA, but that's known to be oxidized by peroxisomal beta-oxidation (source), and ACAD10 seems to be localized to mitochondria, or at least not localized to peroxisomes (source).

I think ACAD10 should be removed from the GPRs of MAR03212 and MAR03163 and also removed from Human-GEM altogether.

This is slightly redundant with the proposed changes in #634, since both reactions are also associated with ACAD11, which is localized to peroxisomes, but the metabolites are all mitochondrial, and #634 proposes new GPRs that only contain genes that code for mitochondrial proteins known to catalyze this kind of reaction.

@haowang-bioinfo
Copy link
Member

@Devlin-Moyer thanks for collecting the evidence, in which the statement "ACAD10 insert were only active with R and S, 2 methyl-C15-CoA among a broad series of other substrates including the optimum ones for all of the other ACADs" supports the removal of MAR03212 and MAR03163, as well as Human-GEM

@Devlin-Moyer Devlin-Moyer mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
3 tasks
@haowang-bioinfo
Copy link
Member

fixed by #740

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants