Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate a transition of Mod Camunda to the Spring Way #218

Open
jeremythuff opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Investigate a transition of Mod Camunda to the Spring Way #218

jeremythuff opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@jeremythuff
Copy link
Member

jeremythuff commented Sep 29, 2023

Currently Mod Camunda is implemented in our own spring-module-core. In FOLIO most exisitng spring modules have been implemented using the EBSCO spring-way implemenation of spring: https://dev.folio.org/guides/spring-way/

We should identify what would need to be done to transition Mod Camunda to using the spring-way approach.

@jeremythuff jeremythuff converted this from a draft issue Sep 29, 2023
@kaladay
Copy link

kaladay commented Oct 2, 2023

Due to the similarities with TAMULib/mod-workflow#112, take Mod-Workflow into consideration when investigating.

@kaladay
Copy link

kaladay commented Oct 5, 2023

@kaladay kaladay assigned kaladay and unassigned kaladay Oct 18, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from 🏃 On Sprint to ⛵ Deploying in FOLIO Oct 26, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from ⛵ Deploying to 👷 In Planning in FOLIO Oct 26, 2023
@jeremythuff jeremythuff moved this from 👷 In Planning to 📋 Backlog in FOLIO Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants