We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What if we want to cleanly exclude a property that could be present in an entity description?
I.e., if this happens on a page:
<Collection> tree:member <A>, <B> . ### member 1 <A> a dcat:Dataset ; dct:title "A" . ### Member 2 <B> a dcat:Distribution ; dct:title "B" . <A> dcat:distribution <B> .
Then we want to make sure that in a Dataset, you don’t want the dcat:distribution link to be included.
dcat:distribution
Proposed solution is to support maxCardinility 0, and thus add a property in a shape topology that indicates the notToBeIncludedPaths.
Problems:
<B>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What if we want to cleanly exclude a property that could be present in an entity description?
I.e., if this happens on a page:
Then we want to make sure that in a Dataset, you don’t want the
dcat:distribution
link to be included.Proposed solution is to support maxCardinility 0, and thus add a property in a shape topology that indicates the notToBeIncludedPaths.
Problems:
<B>
is a blank node instead? Then probably we still want to include it thanks to CBD?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: