-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot sync two AEM 6.4 instances #226
Comments
I faced similar issues.. did you check the grabbit bundle active and running on source and destination servers? check by hitting http://server:port/grabbit/job/all on both servers. if both are running then to get the real error message go to configMgr and enable debug logging for grabbitrecevice and aem error.log. those logs will help you in identifying the root cause of the failure. |
Thanks for pointing out the
the client displays this (which is fine, since all the jobs are supposed to run on this client, but the
After activating the
I'm starting to believe this is some sort of silent timeout error, or something that I do not fully know how to track down. Do you guys know if that might be the case? |
Exactly I have faced all these and were able to fix.. it's a default timeout issue. Update timeout setting on both source and destination servers by going to configmgr and search for something with http jetty and update from default 60000 ms which is one hr to 10hrs by adding a zero to it. You will be all set to happy grabbing from then 😀 |
1 similar comment
Exactly I have faced all these and were able to fix.. it's a default timeout issue. Update timeout setting on both source and destination servers by going to configmgr and search for something with http jetty and update from default 60000 ms which is one hr to 10hrs by adding a zero to it. You will be all set to happy grabbing from then 😀 |
Alright, one of the main reasons why the job was always taking around 60 sec, was because of the timeout issue. @sivaprasad504 you had a great suggestion to check that out, because I saw my test-server firewall was blocking the test-client from connecting back. The funny thing is, now the job fails instantly (156 miliseconds). I would say this is progress, but I am still in the dark about the exact reason:
Is there any other more comprehensive log that I can monitor to see why this job fails? Even on |
I am starting to think that this log message tries to tell me something is wrong, but I cannot figure out what it means:
|
AEM error logshould give you more details on the error, which I'm guessing would be on the timeout of jetty http request. go to configMgr and increase that to few hours and try again. Note: this needs to be done on both source and destination servers. |
Hi @dandinu Can you share following packages if possible i have been trying to get but the links were outdated.
Thanks, |
Hi guys,
I've been trying to sync two AEM systems using Grabbit and everything seems to be installed properly and active in the bundles on both systems. I can succesfully trigger a job, but after I check /CRX/DE, the content is not synced. Here is my info and what I am trying to do.
What version of AEM are you running?
AEM 6.4.1 with Grabbit 7.1.5
How do you produce the issue?
I installed Grabbit 7.1.5 on both machines and I configured the following
config.json
on the server:I run the following command on the same server where the
config.json
is, and I succesfully trigger a job:curl -v -X PUT --header 'Content-Type: text/plain' --data-binary @/mnt/crx/author/grabbit/config.json -u admin:admin http://test-client:4502/grabbit/job
This is what the
test-client
reports after receiving theconfig.json
:The job is reported as
FAILED
and I do not know why.Does the issue occur consistently?
Yes, I am not able to sync the folder at all. here is what it looks like in
./grabbit.sh
:Job when running:
Job when
FAILED
:Help pointing in the right direction
Do you guys have any idea what I should be looking at? I have been poking at this for about two days and I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm really hoping someone can point me in the right direction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: