You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Java VNC needs to go away to a distant land, forever.
To Reproduce
It still exists in the module as a dependency/function.
Expected behaviour
VNC should be via: noVNC (OK), SPICE (add) & XTerm.js (add)
Additional context
This improves security and increases compatibility. In 2023 it makes sense.
As we've overhauled noVNC in theory this process to +2 should be simpler now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lsthompson
changed the title
VNC: Remove TigerVNC (Java); add SPICE and XTerm.js; retain noVNC (overhauled already)
VNC: Add SPICE as 2nd HTML5 option (in addition to existing noVNC)
Dec 5, 2023
lsthompson
changed the title
VNC: Add SPICE as 2nd HTML5 option (in addition to existing noVNC)
VNC: Add SPICE as 2nd HTML5 option (in addition to existing noVNC; Java TigerVNC)
Dec 5, 2023
Hi!
Unfortunately, I didn’t have the qualifications to make either noVNC or Java TigerVNC work from the client area of the panel. (Almost all of my hypervisors are behind NAT) Therefore, I decided that as an alternative option for client access, the container would use its own link to the PVE.
For example, to access the hypervisor https://192.168.8.1:8006 the link https://pve8.example.com will be used
Is it possible to add your own entry point from the admin panel? In my case, would it be convenient to add your own link along with the logo instead of a link in the menu for example Java TigerVNC? Or just the ability to add your own entry point. Thank you.
Describe the bug
Java VNC needs to go away to a distant land, forever.
To Reproduce
It still exists in the module as a dependency/function.
Expected behaviour
VNC should be via: noVNC (OK), SPICE (add) & XTerm.js (add)
Additional context
This improves security and increases compatibility. In 2023 it makes sense.
As we've overhauled noVNC in theory this process to +2 should be simpler now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: