Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable Link-Time Optimization (LTO) #1

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Enable Link-Time Optimization (LTO) #1

zamazan4ik opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

I noticed that in the Cargo.toml file Link-Time Optimization (LTO) for the project is not enabled. I suggest switching it on since it will reduce the binary size (always a good thing to have) and will likely improve the application's performance a bit (not the case for the application but anyway - we are blazingly fast here).

I suggest enabling LTO only for the Release builds so as not to sacrifice the developers' experience while working on the project since LTO consumes an additional amount of time to finish the compilation routine. If you think that a regular Release build should not be affected by such a change as well, then I suggest adding an additional dist or release-lto profile where additionally to regular release optimizations LTO will also be added. Such a change simplifies life for maintainers and others interested in the project persons who want to build the most performant version of the application. Using ThinLTO should also help to reduce the build-time overhead with LTO. If we enable it on the Cargo profile level, users, who install the application with cargo install, will get the LTO-optimized version "automatically". E.g., check cargo-outdated Release profile.

Basically, it can be enabled with the following lines:

[profile.release]
lto = true

Thank you.

P.S. It's more like an improvement idea rather than a bug. I created the issue just because the Discussions are disabled for the repo for now.

@TheQuantumPhysicist
Copy link
Owner

I added LTO by default for release builds and created a release. Usually I'm cautious about LTO because it can ruin security, like with zeroize, but I think in this case it's fine.

I'll keep this case open for a while, in case someone objects to what we did.

@zamazan4ik
Copy link
Author

Usually I'm cautious about LTO because it can ruin security, like with zeroize

Could you please explain this behavior a bit more? Never heard about that before

@TheQuantumPhysicist
Copy link
Owner

There was once a situation where a cryptographic library implemented a special kind of zeroize, and LTO was making its tests fail due to zeroize failure. If you don't know what zeroize is, it's a name of a crate, referencing the process of manually cleaning memory to prevent leaks of cryptographic keys. I try to be careful and not just throw LTO wherever I go.

@zamazan4ik
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the explanation!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants