You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the LICENSE file seems MIT allright, but it also states that tools/jsstyle brings its own license. This license is not reflected in package.json's "licenses" tag.
From my reading, it is CDDL-1.0 with copyrights
2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
2011 Joyent, Inc.
this should be reflected in package.json so automated tools correctly compile licenses for an upstream software package.
probably, the package should even include the license text itself (at least, the references in tools/jsstyle are not helpful)
alternatively, is tools/jsstyle even used? i couldnt find any references. it might be the easy option to remove the file altogether
(sorry for submitting an empty ticket first. "i slipped on my mouse")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dturing
changed the title
a
Clarify use of CDDL in tools/jsstyle
May 13, 2016
the LICENSE file seems MIT allright, but it also states that tools/jsstyle brings its own license. This license is not reflected in package.json's "licenses" tag.
From my reading, it is CDDL-1.0 with copyrights
this should be reflected in package.json so automated tools correctly compile licenses for an upstream software package.
probably, the package should even include the license text itself (at least, the references in tools/jsstyle are not helpful)
alternatively, is tools/jsstyle even used? i couldnt find any references. it might be the easy option to remove the file altogether
(sorry for submitting an empty ticket first. "i slipped on my mouse")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: