Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GUPPI RAW output mode #65

Open
radonnachie opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

GUPPI RAW output mode #65

radonnachie opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@radonnachie
Copy link
Contributor

It'd be helpful in a number of scenarios to be able to upchannelise the data and save that data as GUPPI RAW. Namely because a few tools ingest RAW but have no simple way to upchannelise in situ.

@savinshynu
Copy link

It would be definitely helpful if rawspec can upchannelise the raw data and save them in raw formats without integration. That would be helpful to conduct some diagnostic tests with the telescope data.

@siemion
Copy link
Member

siemion commented Jul 19, 2022

This actually came up in the past, and indeed it would be an extremely useful feature. It would also be good if this mode included the option to selectively write out subsets of a single coarse channel (e.g. upchannelize only a single coarse channel, and then only write out a subset of that channel, for the purposes of extracting complex voltages around a signal of interest). It would also be interesting, although not motivated by any particular current need, to inverse fft back to a (usually lossy) broadband channel.

@radonnachie
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've just completed a GuppiRAW C library that has file-output capabilities. I'll look to implement this feature soon.

@radonnachie
Copy link
Contributor Author

We'll probably want to optionally requantize to integer at the end. That introduces a large task, that I'll leave to a subsequent issue and PR. Initially all guppi outputs will be floating point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants