-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stereoisomerism #331
Comments
Hey. There are weights now which can help prioritise a good RMSD. It should work. I haven't added dihedrals yet. Do you need it urgently? I think I have more example file inputs somewhere. ps. I'll dig out an example with the RMSD, but I have to run now. |
Thanks, I would be interested to see the RMSD example when you have time :) I guess the way it works is that the stero parts are forced into the alchemical region if you make the RMSD constraint very tight? I will try this on my end as well and let you know if it works for me. |
Sure. Thanks, feedback on this would be really handy. So now there is two weights in the
Which is twice the number of matched pairs, over the cumulative number of atoms in topology 1 and 2. So it can only be equal to 1 if the topologies are equal. The RMSD only currently is calculated only for the matched pairs. So it uses the hard-coded cofactor of scoring. Can you modify the I'll test this on #283 tomorrow when I get a minute and then update you here. Cheers |
Had a go with the most recent code and RMSD weights. For the main code with weights [1,1] I get large alchemical regions say 90% appearing and disappearing where as before the RMSD stuff 7faa5d9 I get 10-20%. If I use weights [1,0] I dont recover the old result and now have alchemical regions of around 40%. These regions partially include the stero atoms (previously they were completely ignored) but the bonds of the stero region are messed up. Sorry I cant share the specific examples. I got the best results using the older code and this option Lines 578 to 593 in 4987266
With an automatic way to pass ties the names of stero atoms this might work more generally. |
Hey Mat,
Was there any solutions to do TIES transforms between stereoisomers? With the default setting it seems like the stero parts of the molecule are not seen as different and never included in the alchemical region?
Was the only way to get round this to use knowledge of the dihedrals to distinguish them (#283) or could RMSD be used as well?
Cheers,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: