We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I was working on the levels and adding those. (We have something custom, but I'm thinking I'll create an issue and try to submit something for this)
While they do not exist in cwms-python yet to my knowledge, they will eventually.
It looks like we are using URL lib under the hood and have full control over the responses for Timeseries.
In my opinion, the cmws-python library would add more dependencies to this project. But it is a consistent way to fetch the data against the API.
My vote would be no, but I'm curious if everyone else feels that way
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's arguable, but cwms-python didn't exist at the time of writing this initially.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I was working on the levels and adding those.
(We have something custom, but I'm thinking I'll create an issue and try to submit something for this)
While they do not exist in cwms-python yet to my knowledge, they will eventually.
It looks like we are using URL lib under the hood and have full control over the responses for Timeseries.
In my opinion, the cmws-python library would add more dependencies to this project. But it is a consistent way to fetch the data against the API.
My vote would be no, but I'm curious if everyone else feels that way
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: