Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have a readable version of the form text available regardless of builds, artifacts, systems #13

Open
seanenck opened this issue Mar 2, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@seanenck
Copy link

seanenck commented Mar 2, 2017

I think this may be the original intent of #1 by @marctjones (though I'm not necessarily speaking on behalf of anyone but myself) but that issue (#1) how now become a technical discussion which in the noise has lost an important point which is:

There should be a way to view the form text without a hard requirement on Adobe, Windows, DoD Certs, etc. Whether that is via an extraction from a PDF, building from plain text/latex/etc. and producing a PDF and markdown, or something else - being able to see what the agreement and text is without immediately being restricted down a tool chain (as mentioned above) would be ideal.

Since #1 has become a very technical thing at this point, I would say if possible we should leave this one open unless #1 is fixes and resolves it somehow (e.g. tex, markdown, etc.). This is probably a duplicate of #1 given all things but for clarity sake doing something that isn't the traffic on #1 would help - if we can keep this ticket without technical dumpings of the file and dev notes we're probably better off.

@ckaran
Copy link
Collaborator

ckaran commented Mar 7, 2017

Sure, I'll leave it open until we have a solution in #1.

@ckaran
Copy link
Collaborator

ckaran commented Mar 7, 2017

@fulldecent do you know how hard it is to generate MarkDown files from LaTeX? I'd like to put together a simple build script that generates the various formats from the LaTeX directly to ensure that we don't accidentally have different files with different wording.

@seanenck
Copy link
Author

seanenck commented Mar 7, 2017

@ckaran - the Makefile in form266 branch supports this from the merged PR but for further reference

md: clean
	pandoc $(IN) -o $(BUILD)/form.md

@ckaran
Copy link
Collaborator

ckaran commented Mar 7, 2017

@enckse my apologies, I didn't see it. Unfortunately, I've managed to slightly hose my machine, so I can't test it at the moment. I'll put together a virtual machine to test it out at some point.

@seanenck
Copy link
Author

seanenck commented Mar 7, 2017

Understandable, I think the "real issue" is actually #27 in which I just need to know how/where we should communicate these things :)

@fulldecent
Copy link

@ckaran The pandoc command from @enckse is exactly what I use, or something like

pandoc -f latex IN -t md -o out.md

@ckaran
Copy link
Collaborator

ckaran commented Mar 7, 2017

@fulldecent I understand, and I didn't mean to imply that I didn't think it worked, I just wanted to test it and watch the output myself. That way I can help work on the form too; at the moment I'm kind of hamstrung.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants