You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have several questions and remarks about the suggested workaround.
First, there seems to be an error in the suggested script, in that reject; is not valid (the webmailer raised the issue when i was copy-and-pasting it there). It looks like reject needs some argument detailing the rejection reason.
Second, say I have a .qmail-someaddress-default (containing only the line ./users/someaddress/), whouldn't the closer sieve script contain redirect "someaddress@whateverdomain"; when matching the catchall address? The way I understand it the current workaround sets up a new address that will have to be set up separately in the e-mail address.
This is the script I came up with (for two addresses):
rrrnld
changed the title
Clarification on 'Workaround to keep “-” delimiter catchall'
qmail-migration: Clarification on 'Workaround to keep “-” delimiter catchall'
Sep 5, 2024
I just received a mail regarding my qmail setup, that includes two different dash-delimited catchall mails.
uberspace migration qmail check
helpfully pointed me to those, and very soon I found https://manual.uberspace.de/migration/qmail/reports/config-is-catchall/#workaround-to-keep-delimiter-catchall, which was really nice.I have several questions and remarks about the suggested workaround.
First, there seems to be an error in the suggested script, in that
reject;
is not valid (the webmailer raised the issue when i was copy-and-pasting it there). It looks likereject
needs some argument detailing the rejection reason.Second, say I have a
.qmail-someaddress-default
(containing only the line./users/someaddress/
), whouldn't the closer sieve script containredirect "someaddress@whateverdomain";
when matching the catchall address? The way I understand it the current workaround sets up a new address that will have to be set up separately in the e-mail address.This is the script I came up with (for two addresses):
Does that make sense? Should I open a PR to update the script (and description) accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: