You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You might think it is obvious, but at least one group of scientists programmers didn't think so, and were surprised when I told them that the start/count arrays must be the same size as the variable's dimensions.
They were routinely using start/count arrays of 3, for 4-D variables. I'm not even sure how or why that worked.
I checked the documentation, and we really don't make this clear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You might think it is obvious, but at least one group of scientists programmers didn't think so, and were surprised when I told them that the start/count arrays must be the same size as the variable's dimensions.
They were routinely using start/count arrays of 3, for 4-D variables. I'm not even sure how or why that worked.
I checked the documentation, and we really don't make this clear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: