-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usage of valid_min, valid_max attributes for masking data #670
Comments
The code tries to set values outside the valid range to the missing_value, but this variable has no missing_value. It's not clear to me from the CF docs whether it should use the _FillValue in this case. |
The CF docs specify
in their section about missing data |
Fix for this in pull request #672 |
closed by pull request #672 |
I'm not sure that this is a bug since you indicated in #493 that CF conventions should be handled by downstream applications.
The attached file is slightly wrong since the values outside of the valid range are not the same as the
_FillValue
but according to CF they should still be masked since they are outside of the definedvalid_min
-valid_max
range.See the below example on the attached file:
outputs:
W_XX-EUMETSAT-Darmstadt,SURFACE+SATELLITE,METOPB+ASCAT_C_EUMP_20170101003900_22253_eps_o_125_l1.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: