You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Unitex/GramLab code for inflection of simple words, the Semitic mode (user manual, section 3.5.4) is presently incompatible with R, C and D, which are 3 of the inflection operators described in the manual (section 3.5.1).
Current work with Prihantoro (Diponegoro University) suggests that it would be useful for the description of Indonesian to use both the Semitic mode and the R operator in the same inflection graphs: the Semitic mode for reduplication, and R for morphological variations of the stem. Some Indonesian words undergo both reduplication and morphological variations of the stem.
Example
DELAs entry: balik
DELAF entry: balak-balik
The C and D operators are likely to be useful in the same conditions.
I suggest the Semitic mode should be made compatible with the R, C and D operators.
It is already compatible with the L, <R=?>, <I=?> and <X=n> operators.
In the attached logs, the dictionary invokes 2 inflection graphs:
V232LLak-ref.grf without the Semitic mode,
V232LLak.grf in the Semitic mode.
The first graph produces the morphological variants (e.g. balak) but not the reduplication.
The second graph produces the reduplication, but not all the morphological variants work.
Thanks,
Eric
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submitted by @eric-laporte
Feature Request
In the Unitex/GramLab code for inflection of simple words, the Semitic mode (user manual, section 3.5.4) is presently incompatible with R, C and D, which are 3 of the inflection operators described in the manual (section 3.5.1).
Current work with Prihantoro (Diponegoro University) suggests that it would be useful for the description of Indonesian to use both the Semitic mode and the R operator in the same inflection graphs: the Semitic mode for reduplication, and R for morphological variations of the stem. Some Indonesian words undergo both reduplication and morphological variations of the stem.
Example
balik
balak-balik
The C and D operators are likely to be useful in the same conditions.
I suggest the Semitic mode should be made compatible with the R, C and D operators.
It is already compatible with the L, <R=?>, <I=?> and <X=n> operators.
In the attached logs, the dictionary invokes 2 inflection graphs:
The first graph produces the morphological variants (e.g. balak) but not the reduplication.
The second graph produces the reduplication, but not all the morphological variants work.
Thanks,
Eric
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: