Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible let the user choose one specific host from pool with PhysicalMachine Service? #95

Closed
jonsito opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jonsito
Copy link

jonsito commented Nov 9, 2023

Hi all
In our student's lab we have a set of physical machines running Ubuntu 20.04. By mean of OpenUDS's PhysicalMachine Service (MultipleIP) we can remotely access to them. Everything ok.

But in some circumstances is desirable that the student could choose which machine to connect to. Currently the only way to do it is mapping user-to-machine in configuration, but this solution implies a lot of maintenance work and is not enought
flexible.

Is there a way to let the user to choose which machine in the pool to connect to?. Something like a textbox under Machine connection icon as image shows.

Thanks in advance.

Captura de pantalla de 2023-11-09 10-06-21
Juan Antonio

@jonsito jonsito changed the title Is it possible let the user choose one specific machine from pool with PhysicalMachine Service Is it possible let the user choose one specific machine from pool with PhysicalMachine Service? Nov 9, 2023
@jonsito jonsito changed the title Is it possible let the user choose one specific machine from pool with PhysicalMachine Service? Is it possible let the user choose one specific host from pool with PhysicalMachine Service? Nov 9, 2023
@dkmstr
Copy link
Collaborator

dkmstr commented Nov 9, 2023

If you want to do this, you can always create a "service" for every computer, and show them all. Currently, there is no other way of allowing a user to select a machine from a pool, and, apart of this method, there is no planning for such support.

Note that the problem with this is that the user may access a machine assigned to other user, and that is not desirable also..

Anyway, i'll take this into account for future service management changes.

Sorry for the inconvenience :(

@dkmstr dkmstr closed this as completed Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants