-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Custom] Should attachedCallback/detachedCallback callbacks be called when element is added to / removed from shadom dom which is attached to a in-document host? (bugzilla: 26943) #191
Comments
Also see the issue #362. |
I specced this per #362:
(and similarly for connectedCallback). Please re-open or open a new issue/pull request if I got that wrong. |
What about newAncestor/oldAncestor? |
What about it? What is it? |
It's the argument passed to "insertion steps" / "removing steps". |
Why is that relevant here? |
Because why should that primitive not be exposed to connected/disconnected? |
Because connected/disconnected are different from inserted/removed, and we never discussed this previously, so you're proposing an entirely new feature? |
The only difference is that connected/disconnected require the element's shadow-host-including root to be a document, right? How does that change what context you might need? I guess I'm fine not exposing this for now, we can add it when there's a need. |
Sounds good. Feel free to open a new issue proposing it for wider discussion. |
Title: [Custom] Should attachedCallback/detachedCallback callbacks be called when element is added to / removed from shadom dom which is attached to a in-document host? (bugzilla: 26943)
Migrated from: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26943
comment: 0
comment_url: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26943#c0
Olli Pettay wrote on 2014-10-01 09:43:50 +0000.
Per the current spec attachedCallback/detachedCallback explicitly aren't
called if the element isn't inserted into / removed from a document.
I think we want the callbacks to be called also in shadow DOM case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: