Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

easy way to shut down a site #63

Open
dsschult opened this issue Jan 10, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

easy way to shut down a site #63

dsschult opened this issue Jan 10, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@dsschult
Copy link
Collaborator

We need an easy way to shut down a site from the server end, since often the person running the client can't be reached. Something server-side where if a certain client connects it gets rejected or sent 0 jobs.

@dsschult
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I had a thought - if we get automatic updating (#12) working we could just update the config file for that site to tell it not to queue any jobs.

@jvansanten
Copy link
Collaborator

jvansanten commented Mar 1, 2017

That is one way to do it, but it clutters up the revision history with operations info. A lighter way to achieve the same thing would be make the server return an empty state if the client_id is on a server-side blacklist. Both approaches would only drain the banned site instead of shutting it down immediately, but that's probably better than nothing.

@vbrik
Copy link
Collaborator

vbrik commented Jul 10, 2017

Do we want to do this on the server side, or condor configuration of the central manager? (Or perhaps these are two different issues?) Perhaps using NEGOTIATOR_SLOT_CONSTRAINT or APPEND_REQUIREMENTS?

@dsschult
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If there's a way to tell the negotiator to stop matching a node, that would be great.

We also want something to stop the submission of new glideins, such as @jvansanten suggested in comment 3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants