You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Take the following example of 4 objects, two sharing ids:
In [34]: for obj in sr.get_objects():
...: print(obj.id)
...:
93545273046d4857b30037ad4d59463f
93545273046d4857b30037ad4d59463f
4bc8bfd37c654748a9aa899a3c413e84
4bc8bfd37c654748a9aa899a3c413e84
Currently, OCFLStorageRoot.get_object():
takes the passed identifier
using storage engine, checks for object at that calculated path
if present, returns
In this construed example, though two OCFL objects share the same identifier, one of them is not valid in the context of the Storage Root's storage engine (storage_pair_tree in this instance). This makes this issue acutely related to #7.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Take the following example of 4 objects, two sharing ids:
Currently,
OCFLStorageRoot.get_object()
:In this construed example, though two OCFL objects share the same identifier, one of them is not valid in the context of the Storage Root's storage engine (
storage_pair_tree
in this instance). This makes this issue acutely related to #7.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: