You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are valid and valuable use cases for binding verified physical identities in a decentralized web-of-trust system. Is this really a problem, and if so, should we ignore it, integrate traditional CA verification methods, or find a new way to solve it?
A comment and question to the participants this week:
Binding a token (aka private key) to attributes (a unique identifier) is already hard enough, do we need to tackle the problem of also binding these both to physical identity _at this Designshop_? We could tackle these problems separately later, but it does make it difficult to help the #identity2020 people with their Refugee Use Case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
/re binding-identity-in-decentralized-system.md #bce5f9a
/cc @wthayer
Wayne asks:
A comment and question to the participants this week:
Binding a token (aka private key) to attributes (a unique identifier) is already hard enough, do we need to tackle the problem of also binding these both to physical identity _at this Designshop_? We could tackle these problems separately later, but it does make it difficult to help the #identity2020 people with their Refugee Use Case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: